Adalo vs Softr 2026
Short answer: pick Softr if you are building a client portal, internal tool, or CRM on top of data that already lives in Airtable, Google Sheets, or HubSpot; pick Adalo if you need a real app in the Apple App Store and Google Play, because Softr cannot publish there at any price. Softr scores 4.2/5 overall in our tests, Adalo 3.9/5, and Softr wins all five scored criteria.
The angle nobody updated: both platforms shipped a competing AI builder within 21 days of each other. Adalo launched Ada on March 10, 2026; Softr launched its AI Co-Builder on March 31, 2026. Ada outputs a native multi-screen mobile app with unlimited usage on every plan. Softr generates a full web app, database, auth, permissions, and workflows from one prompt in under 60 seconds. Those two launches, plus the App Store gap, decide most of this match.
True native iOS and Android publishing, AI included on all plans. Mobile-first, PWA rivals cannot match it.
Try Adalo for free →Read the full Adalo review →17+ two-way data sources, granular permissions, AI Co-Builder in under 60s. Web-only, no App Store.
Try Softr for free →Read the full Softr review →Who wins for you
Softr connects to 17+ external sources with two-way sync. Adalo leans on its own internal database with external collections added via API.
Try Softr for free →Adalo compiles real native binaries with one-click store submission. Softr is PWA-only and cannot list on any app store.
Try Adalo for free →Softr's AI Co-Builder generates UI, database, auth, permissions and workflows in under 60 seconds. Ada is fast too but tuned for single-canvas mobile output.
Try Softr for free →Softr Free publishes unlimited apps to 10 users with a custom domain. Adalo Free cannot publish a single app at all.
Try Softr for free →Adalo vs Softr at a glance
Every cell is grounded in official pricing and docs checked June 11, 2026. Read the native publishing and free plan rows first, they frame everything else.
| Adalo | Softr | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free plan, published apps | 0, you cannot publish on the free tier | Unlimited apps, share with up to 10 users | Softr |
| Free plan, records | 500 records per app | 1,000 records per app | Softr |
| Entry paid priceAdalo wins the sticker for solo mobile; Softr wins once you add users | $36/user/mo (Starter, annual), 1 app, 1 editor | $49/mo flat (Basic, annual), per workspace not per seat | — |
| Native iOS / Android publishing | Yes, true native binaries, one-click App Store submission | No, PWA only, no App Store listing | Adalo |
| External data sources | Internal DB primary; Airtable, Zapier, Xano via custom setup | 17+ native two-way sources: Airtable, Sheets, HubSpot, Notion, Supabase, SQL | Softr |
| AI builderDifferent strengths: Ada for mobile, Co-Builder for web plus permissions | Ada, launched Mar 10, 2026; unlimited usage on all plans | AI Co-Builder, launched Mar 31, 2026; full app from a prompt in under 60s | — |
| User and permission model | Basic user roles, limited access controls | Granular role-based access, user groups, app-level permissions, SSO on Enterprise | Softr |
| Workflow automation | Basic interactions and custom app actions | Native multi-step Workflows plus Zapier, Make, n8n | Softr |
| Free plan AI credits | Ada included, unlimited usage, no token caps | 5 AI credits per month | Adalo |
| Default paid support | 24 to 48h email and ticket; 1-day SLA on Team ($160/mo) | Live chat and email; 4.8/5 customer service on Capterra | Softr |
| Overall test score | 3.9 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 | Softr |
| Ideal user | Mobile-first founders needing real App Store distribution | Portal, internal-tool and CRM builders with external data | — |
Prices checked June 11, 2026 on adalo.com/pricing and softr.io/pricing.
Criterion by criterion, head to head
The same five criteria we scored on each tool's review page. Equal scores still get a clear pick.
01 Round 1: getting a first app live.
Softr edges this 4.7 to 4.5, and the gap is narrow because both are genuinely approachable. Softr's block-based builder and AI Co-Builder are the fastest path to a working app with zero prior no-code experience. Reviewers on Capterra repeatedly note that a first app goes live with no technical background and almost no training. Capterra ease-of-use lands at 4.8/5 for Softr against 4.1/5 for Adalo across 63 and 25 reviews.
Adalo's visual multi-screen canvas is praised for intuitive drag-and-drop on simple apps, but anything past a basic layout has a learning curve, especially wiring database relationships, custom formulas, and conditional actions. Adalo 3.0 in late 2025 fixed the old laggy editor that frustrated everyone, so the experience is much smoother now, yet relational multi-screen complexity remains. The honest trade-off: Softr's block library is more constrained, which some find liberating and others find limiting when they want deep customization. Ada and the Co-Builder both generate a starting app in under a minute, but Adalo asks for more manual refinement on multi-user permission structures.
Choose Adalo if you want a visual canvas you can extend with custom components and mobile-first control.
Choose Softr if you want a business tool or portal live the same day with no coding background.
02 Round 2: where the real bill lands.
Softr takes this 4.1 to 3.5, mostly on per-workspace pricing. A 100-user internal tool on Softr Professional costs $139/mo, roughly $1.39 per user per month. At that volume Adalo has no comparable flat price because it bills per app and per editor. Softr Free is also genuinely usable: unlimited apps, custom domain, 1,000 records, 10 app users, and 5 AI credits. You can ship a real early-stage product at $0. Adalo Free cannot publish anything, so it works as a prototyping sandbox, not a launch tier.
Adalo's $36/mo Starter is still the cheapest native mobile publisher on the market, but it is strictly solo: 1 editor, 1 app. Any team or second app jumps to $52 (Professional) or $160 (Team). Both tools carry add-on risk. Softr charges per-user overage at $10 per 10 users, extra domains at $13/mo, and AI credit top-ups; some Reddit threads call its per-external-user model unsustainable, since a simple read-only portal with 200 users lands you on the $269/mo Business tier. Adalo's per-app ceiling forces a plan jump the moment an agency needs one more published app. Capterra value-for-money: Softr 4.6/5 versus Adalo 3.4/5.
Choose Adalo if you are solo and want unlimited AI plus the cheapest native mobile publishing at $36/mo.
Choose Softr if you run multi-user tools where per-workspace flat pricing beats per-seat math.
03 Round 3: raw power and where each hits a ceiling.
Softr wins this 4.5 to 4.0 on full-stack business breadth. In 2026 it covers 17+ native data source connections, granular role-based permissions, SOC 2 Type II, e-signatures on Professional and up, built-in workflow automation, AI Agents that enrich database records, Ask AI for plain-language querying, and Softr Payments. That is a lot of platform for a no-code web builder.
Adalo's strength is native mobile depth, and it is the one clear edge here: true iOS and Android compilation with push notifications, geolocation, Adalo Marketplace components, custom formulas, and design versioning. No competing no-code tool at $36/mo publishes real native binaries. Softr has no App Store path at all, its apps run as PWAs that work in a mobile browser but never appear in a store. Adalo's weak spot is permissions: fine for logged-in versus guest, not for multi-tier B2B portals where different client organizations see different data, which Softr handles natively. Softr's Workflows (added late 2025) reduce the Zapier dependency but do not remove it, and Adalo users still lean on Zapier or Make for serious automation. Both shipping AI builders 21 days apart in March 2026 tells you how central AI-native generation has become.
Choose Adalo for mobile-first apps that need App Store distribution, offline features, and custom components.
Choose Softr for data-connected business apps with complex permissions, external sources, and workflow automation.
04 Round 4: who answers when it breaks.
Softr wins this decisively, 4.5 to 3.5. Its highest Capterra category score is customer service at 4.8/5 across 63 reviews, a remarkably consistent result. Users describe support as fast, helpful, and proactive. Enterprise adds a dedicated success manager and unlimited onboarding. On paid plans below Enterprise, live chat and email come without a published SLA, but the review sentiment points to far quicker resolution than the rival.
Adalo support is a team of 14 people serving more than 100,000 registered users, a structural mismatch that shows in 24 to 48h response times on standard plans, with a 1-day SLA reserved for the Team plan at $160/mo. Adalo forum threads from 2025 to 2026 include multiple users frustrated by support that redirected them to documentation instead of resolving the issue, and the peer community forum is often recommended as faster than official channels. Credit where due: Adalo 3.0 removed many stability-related escalations (slow apps, editor lag) that used to inflate ticket volume. Capterra customer service: Softr 4.8/5 versus Adalo 3.4/5.
Choose Adalo Team ($160/mo) if you want the 1-day SLA and are happy to supplement with community help.
Choose Softr for any team that needs reliable, responsive support on day-to-day use.
05 Round 5: native two-way sync vs a self-contained database.
Softr wins this 4.0 to 3.8, mainly on native breadth. It ships 17+ two-way data source connections (Airtable, Google Sheets, HubSpot, Notion, Supabase, MySQL, PostgreSQL, BigQuery, monday.com, ClickUp, Coda and more), automation via Zapier, Make and n8n, AI model connections to OpenAI, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini, plus Gmail, Slack, Google Calendar and Calendly. That is 30+ integration touchpoints. The deep two-way Airtable sync is its signature: Airtable-first teams often pick Softr precisely because nothing else syncs as cleanly with their data structures.
Adalo's integrations include Airtable via external collections, Zapier, Make, Xano (native on Team and up), IAPHUB for in-app purchases, Mixpanel, DreamFactory, and custom REST APIs. The model leans on Adalo's custom actions system, which needs more setup than Softr's native connectors. The Xano partnership on the Team plan is the smart play: Xano adds a scalable backend with cron jobs and code functions that compensate for Adalo's own database ceiling. The honest caveat on Softr: some of its richer data source options are gated behind Business and up, which narrows the effective set on Free and Basic. Both lean on Zapier or Make as the universal fallback.
Choose Adalo if you want a self-contained database with external backends added selectively via Xano or REST.
Choose Softr if your data already lives in Airtable, Sheets, HubSpot or SQL and you want two-way sync without middleware.
The real cost, plan by plan
Adalo bills per app and per editor; Softr bills per workspace. That single difference flips the cheaper option depending on your shape. We list the plans, then run three worked examples the data supports.
| Adalo | Softr | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FreeSoftr Free can actually ship; Adalo Free is a prototyping sandbox | $0, 0 published apps, 1 editor, 500 records/app, Ada AI unlimited | $0, unlimited apps, 10 users, 1,000 records, custom domain, 5 AI credits | Softr |
| Entry planAdalo cheaper sticker for solo native mobile; Softr richer for web data apps | Starter $36/mo annual, 1 app, 1 editor, 5 GB, App Store publishing, Ada AI | Basic $49/mo annual, 20 users, 50K records, Kanban, Map and Payment blocks | — |
| Mid planDifferent units: Adalo prices apps and editors, Softr prices app users and capacity | Professional $52/mo annual, 2 apps, 5 editors, 25 GB, custom integrations, push | Professional $139/mo annual, 100 users, 500K records, 3 user groups, API, e-signatures | — |
| Upper tier | Team $160/mo annual, 5 apps, 10 editors, 125 GB, Xano included, API, white label | Business $269/mo annual, 500 users, 1M records, unlimited user groups, advanced sources | — |
| Solo founder, 1 native appIf the App Store is the goal, Adalo is the only option of the two | Adalo Starter: $36/mo ($432/yr); App Store publishing, unlimited Ada AI, custom domain | Softr cannot publish a native app at any tier | Adalo |
| Internal tool, 80 usersPer-workspace flat pricing is unbeatable for high-user web portals | Adalo has no comparable per-user web tier; per-app and per-editor model does not fit | Softr Professional: $139/mo ($1,668/yr); ~$1.74/user/mo, e-signatures, API | Softr |
| Agency, 5 isolated client appsPer-workspace billing makes Softr pricier for agencies needing separate client workspaces | Adalo Team: $160/mo ($1,920/yr); 5 published apps, $384/app/yr, white label | Softr Professional x5 workspaces: $417/mo ($5,004/yr) if each client needs isolation | Adalo |
Prices checked June 11, 2026 on adalo.com/pricing and softr.io/pricing. Adalo bills per app and per editor; Softr bills per workspace, with per-user overage at $10 per 10 users and extra domains at $13/mo.
Pick by scenario
Choose Adalo if...
- You need a real native app in the Apple App Store and Google Play Store, Softr cannot do this at any price and Adalo is the only option of the two
- You are a solo founder building a first mobile app and want the cheapest native publisher with unlimited AI: $36/mo Starter, no token caps on Ada
- Custom component extensibility via the Adalo Marketplace matters, community-built components add what Softr's block model cannot
- You want a built-in relational database ready on day one with no third-party account to connect
- Your app is mobile-first and PWA browser access is not an acceptable substitute: offline, push notifications, camera, GPS
Choose Softr if...
- Your data lives in Airtable, Google Sheets, HubSpot, Notion or SQL and you want a web front-end without duplicating data or managing sync
- You are building a client portal, partner portal, internal tool, CRM or employee directory, Softr's core use case in 2026
- Speed to first working app matters most: the AI Co-Builder goes from prompt to full app in under 60 seconds
- You need granular user-group permissions for a B2B multi-tenant app where each organization sees only its own data, Adalo cannot
- Support responsiveness is non-negotiable: Softr's Capterra customer service is 4.8/5 versus Adalo's 3.4/5
Frequently asked questions
Is Adalo or Softr better for mobile apps in 2026?
It depends on what mobile means for you. If you need an app in the Apple App Store or Google Play, a real downloadable app users find by searching, only Adalo delivers it. Adalo compiles true native iOS and Android binaries; Softr produces PWAs that work in mobile browsers but cannot be submitted to any store. If a web app that looks good on mobile is enough, Softr is the stronger overall builder. The decision tree is short: App Store required goes to Adalo, web-first or PWA acceptable goes to Softr.How much does Adalo actually cost vs Softr for a 5-person team?
Adalo Professional is $52/mo ($624/yr) for 5 editors, 2 published apps, and 25 GB. Softr Professional is $139/mo ($1,668/yr) for unlimited web apps, 100 app users, and 500K records. If you build one or two apps for internal use with up to 100 users, Softr wins on cost per user. If you need native mobile publishing for two client apps with a small team, Adalo wins on absolute price. Neither charges a per-seat fee, both bill per workspace, though Adalo also caps editors and apps per plan.Adalo vs Softr vs Bubble, which is best in 2026?
Adalo wins for native mobile, it is the only one of the three that publishes to app stores. Softr wins for data-connected business tools, with the fastest time to production for portals and internal tools on external databases. Bubble sits between them: far more powerful and customizable than either, but with a steeper learning curve measured in weeks, higher paid pricing, and a more developer-adjacent model. Rule of thumb: MVP mobile app goes to Adalo, client portal or internal tool goes to Softr, complex custom logic or a heavily customized SaaS goes to Bubble.Can Softr publish apps to the App Store?
No. Softr apps are web applications built as PWAs. They are fully responsive and can be installed to a home screen on iOS and Android, but they are not listed on the Apple App Store or Google Play and cannot use native device APIs beyond what a browser exposes. If your project requires an actual App Store listing, Adalo is your no-code option between these two. Softr's strength is elsewhere, in connecting web front-ends to external data with permissions and workflows.Can you migrate from Adalo to Softr, or the other way?
There is no native migration path between the two. Adalo uses a proprietary internal database; Softr connects to external sources like Airtable or its own Softr Database. The practical route from Adalo to Softr is: export Adalo data to CSV, import it to Airtable or Google Sheets, then rebuild the interface in Softr. The reverse is similarly manual. Budget one to three weeks for a mid-size app, more if you have complex relational data. For new projects, choosing the right platform upfront avoids this cost entirely.Is Adalo's free plan actually usable?
For prototyping and testing, yes. For shipping a real app to users, no. Adalo Free allows unlimited test apps with 500 records per app, but published apps are zero, you cannot put an app in the App Store or hand users a live URL on the free tier. You must upgrade to Starter at $36/mo to publish anything. Softr Free, by contrast, publishes unlimited apps to up to 10 logged-in users with a custom domain, which makes it genuinely usable for an early-stage product at $0.What is Softr's AI Co-Builder and is it worth it in 2026?
Softr's AI Co-Builder launched March 31, 2026 and generates a complete business app, including database schema, UI pages, user authentication, permissions, and workflows, from a plain-language prompt in under 60 seconds. Unlike earlier AI generators that produce screens only, it creates a working app connected to your data source on first generation. CEO Mariam Hakobyan frames it as solving the day-two problem, where most AI builders make impressive demos that fall apart on extension. It runs on all paid plans; the free tier includes 5 AI credits per month.What is Adalo's Ada AI and how does it compare to Softr's AI Co-Builder?
Adalo launched Ada on March 10, 2026, 21 days before Softr's Co-Builder. Ada has three functions: Magic Start (a prompt generates a full app structure with tables, screens and navigation), Magic Add (extend an app by describing new features), and X-Ray (spot performance issues in live apps). The key difference: Ada outputs to Adalo's visual multi-screen canvas, tuned for native iOS and Android, so you get a real mobile app you can publish to stores. Softr's Co-Builder outputs a web app with richer permissions and workflow logic. Ada is unlimited on every plan including Free; the Co-Builder is credit-gated at 5 per month on Free and 50 on Professional.Which is better for agencies, Adalo or Softr?
It depends on the agency. Mobile-first agencies building consumer apps for clients lean Adalo, for native publishing, per-app flat pricing, and white labeling on Team at $160/mo. Digital agencies building client portals, dashboards, or internal tools lean Softr, for external data connections, client-facing permissions, and faster delivery. One warning for Softr-based agencies: its per-workspace pricing means each client may need a separate workspace and therefore a separate subscription, so anyone managing 5+ client workspaces should negotiate volume pricing or verify workspace-sharing options before committing.What happened to Adalo in 2025 and 2026, is it still relevant?
Yes, more so than in 2023 to 2024. Adalo 3.0 in late 2025 was a full infrastructure rebuild: migration to AWS, autoscaling, server-side data processing, region-based sharding, a 3 to 4x speed improvement, average latency down to 165.92ms, and image load times from 6.32s to 1.15s. Record limits on paid plans were removed entirely. Then Ada launched on March 10, 2026, unifying app generation, feature extension, and live performance diagnosis. Early 2026 reviews mark a clear before and after, with old complaints about slow apps replaced by positive speed feedback. Adalo's niche, sub-$40 native mobile no-code with AI included, stays essentially uncontested.
Test both, then decide
Free to start on both sides. The fastest way to know is to rebuild one real project on each and see which one fits how your team actually works.
Best for mobile-first founders and agencies that need real App Store and Play Store distribution, a built-in database, and unlimited AI from the $36/mo Starter tier.
Try Adalo for free →Read the full Adalo review →Best for teams building portals, internal tools, and CRMs on top of Airtable, Sheets, or HubSpot, with granular permissions and an AI Co-Builder that ships a full app in under 60 seconds.
Try Softr for free →Read the full Softr review →Affiliate links: if you sign up through them, you support our independent hands-on tests at no extra cost to you. Both tools are scored the same way and the weak spots on each are disclosed honestly.
Get the next comparison in your inbox
Join 2,400+ makers who get our independent tool tests every week.