Miro Alternatives
Six Miro alternatives, one honest test, five criteria each.
Miro is a deserved 3.8 out of 5 in our test: a deep, polished infinite canvas with the biggest template and integration library on the market. The catch is what sits around the canvas. The free plan locks you to three editable boards, pricing is charged per editor, and support is slow. If that is where Miro pinches, here are the six alternatives we rate highest, scored hands-on so you can pick the right whiteboard fast.
Some links are affiliate links, and it never affects our scores or ranking.
Why teams leave Miro
Let us be fair: Miro is one of the best visual collaboration tools you can buy. The infinite canvas is fast, the template library is enormous, and it scores 4.5 on ease of use and 4.7 on features in our test, the highest feature depth in this list. People do not leave because Miro is bad. They leave because the free plan is tight, the cost climbs with every editor, and support lags, and a handful of specific frictions push them to look elsewhere.
The free plan locks you to three boards
You pay per editor, and it adds up
Support is slow and tier-gated
Features keep migrating to higher tiers
It can be heavy for simple jobs
No EU data residency on lower plans
6 Miro alternatives compared
Here are the six alternatives at a glance. Scores are our editorial assessment across five criteria, grounded in G2 and Capterra consensus and documented 2026 pricing. The edge column is the single biggest reason to consider each one over Miro. Tap any tool to jump straight to its full breakdown.
| Best for | Edge over Miro | Free plan | Team size | Visit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FigJam | Best value alternative | Cheaper per editor, Figma-native | 4.2/5 | Free plan, paid from $5/editor/mo | ✓ | Design & product teams | Visit → |
| 2 | Mural | Best for facilitation | Built for structured workshops | 4.1/5 | Free plan, paid from $9.99/member/mo | ✓ | Facilitators & workshops | Visit → |
| 3 | Lucidspark | Best for diagramming | Pairs with Lucidchart diagrams | 4.0/5 | Free plan, paid from ~$8/user/mo | ✓ | Teams that also diagram | Visit → |
| 4 | Excalidraw | Best free & open-source | Free, open-source, fast sketches | 3.9/5 | Free, Excalidraw+ ~$7/seat/mo | ✓ | Engineers & solo users | Visit → |
| 5 | Conceptboard | Best EU-hosted | EU hosting, GDPR-first | 3.6/5 | Free plan, paid from ~$6/user/mo | ✓ | EU & regulated teams | Visit → |
| 6 | Microsoft Whiteboard | Best for Microsoft 365 teams | Free with Microsoft 365 | 3.4/5 | Included with Microsoft 365 | ✓ | Microsoft-first orgs | Visit → |
Scores are our editorial assessment. Pricing checked 2026.
Which alternative is right for you?
Half Miro's price per editor, and free if you already live in Figma.
You run workshops and trainingMuralBuilt for structured facilitation, with private mode, voting and timers.
You also need real diagramsLucidsparkBrainstorming that pairs with Lucidchart for flowcharts and architecture.
You want free and lightweightExcalidrawOpen-source, instant, perfect for quick engineering sketches.
You need EU data hostingConceptboardEuropean-hosted and GDPR-first out of the box, no enterprise tier needed.
You already pay for Microsoft 365Microsoft WhiteboardA free whiteboard bundled with the seats you already own.
FigJam
FigJam is the alternative most Miro leavers should try first, for one reason Miro cannot match on price: it charges roughly 5 dollars per editor against Miro's 10 or more, and it is free for the design teams already paying for Figma. It is the playful, approachable side of Figma, with sticky notes, AI that generates and clusters boards, and a clean canvas that gets a non-technical team productive in minutes. In testing it felt lighter and friendlier than Miro, scoring 4.6 on ease, and value is a clear win at 4.4 against Miro's 2.8. Miro still wins on raw depth: its 4.7 features score beats FigJam's 4.0, its template and integration library is bigger, and it handles huge, complex boards more comfortably. FigJam is the better call for design-led teams who want value and simplicity, and the worse call if you need the deepest enterprise whiteboard on the market.
- Roughly half Miro's price per editor
- Free for teams already on Figma
- AI that generates and clusters boards
- Clean, friendly canvas anyone can use
- ✓Much better value than Miro (4.4 vs 2.8)
- ✓Tightly integrated with Figma design files
- ✓Quick to learn for non-technical users
- ✓Generous free plan for small teams
- ✗Less feature depth than Miro (4.0 vs 4.7)
- ✗Smaller integration library than Miro
- ✗Best value is tied to the Figma ecosystem
| Criterion | FigJam | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| From (per editor) | ~$5 | ~$10 |
| Value (our score) | 4.4 | 2.8 |
| Features (our score) | 4.0 | 4.7 |
| Ease (our score) | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Free plan | Yes | 3 boards |
Switch if you want a friendlier whiteboard at half the per-editor price, especially on Figma, but Miro still wins if you need the deepest features and the biggest template and integration library.
Mural
Mural is the alternative for anyone whose job is running the room, not just drawing on a canvas. It is the closest head-to-head rival to Miro, but built around structured facilitation: private mode for silent brainstorming, timed voting, and the ability to summon every participant to one spot on the board. For workshops, training and design sprints it feels purpose-built where Miro feels general-purpose, and its 4.4 feature depth is strong. Pricing is in the same ballpark, with a free plan capped at three murals and paid tiers from 9.99 dollars per member. Miro still wins on breadth and ecosystem: its integration and template library is larger, and it scores a touch higher on ease at 4.5 against Mural's 4.2. Mural is the better pick when facilitation is the point, and the worse pick when you want the broadest general canvas.
- Facilitation tools: private mode, voting, timers
- Summon participants to a board area
- Strong workshop and template library
- Enterprise controls and data residency
- ✓Purpose-built for workshops and training
- ✓Excellent structured facilitation features
- ✓Strong feature depth (4.4)
- ✓Free plan like Miro's, three murals
- ✗Per-member pricing, similar cost to Miro
- ✗Smaller integration ecosystem than Miro
- ✗Slightly less polished general canvas
| Criterion | Mural | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Facilitation tools | Built-in | Add-on feel |
| Features (our score) | 4.4 | 4.7 |
| Ease (our score) | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Integrations (our score) | 4.1 | 4.3 |
| From | $9.99 | ~$10 |
Switch if you run structured workshops and want facilitation built in, but Miro still wins on integration breadth, template variety and a slightly smoother general canvas.
Lucidspark
Lucidspark is Lucid Software's answer to Miro, and its edge is what sits next door: Lucidchart. If your team brainstorms on a whiteboard but also needs proper flowcharts, org charts or architecture diagrams, Lucidspark and Lucidchart share one suite, so messy ideas turn into structured diagrams without changing tools. The canvas is clean, AI helps cluster and summarize notes, and a free plan covers three editable boards. Value sits a notch under FigJam at 3.7 but well above Miro's 2.8. Miro still wins on pure whiteboarding depth and a larger integration library, scoring 4.7 features against Lucidspark's 4.2, and its standalone canvas is a touch more powerful. Lucidspark is the better pick when diagramming and brainstorming live together, and the worse pick when you only need the single deepest whiteboard.
- Pairs with Lucidchart for real diagrams
- Clean brainstorming canvas with AI
- Voting, timers and facilitation basics
- Free plan with three editable boards
- ✓Best when you also need flowcharts and diagrams
- ✓Better value than Miro (3.7 vs 2.8)
- ✓Tidy, approachable interface
- ✓Strong feature depth for the price (4.2)
- ✗Less whiteboarding depth than Miro (4.2 vs 4.7)
- ✗Best value tied to the wider Lucid suite
- ✗Smaller integration library than Miro
| Criterion | Lucidspark | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Diagramming sibling | Lucidchart | Limited |
| Value (our score) | 3.7 | 2.8 |
| Features (our score) | 4.2 | 4.7 |
| Ease (our score) | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Free plan | Yes | 3 boards |
Switch if you want brainstorming and proper diagramming in one suite, but Miro still wins on standalone whiteboarding depth and a larger integration ecosystem.
Excalidraw
Excalidraw is the alternative for anyone who finds Miro far more than they need. It is open-source, opens instantly with no login, and its hand-drawn aesthetic signals rough thinking rather than polished deliverables, which is exactly why it became the default quick-sketch tool for engineering teams. Value is unbeatable at 4.8 because the core is genuinely free, and ease is the highest in this list at 4.7. The trade-off is honest and large: feature depth scores just 3.1 against Miro's 4.7, there is no real facilitation suite, integrations are thin at 3.4, and as an open-source project formal support is limited, hence 2.9. Excalidraw+ adds shared libraries from around 7 dollars per seat. Excalidraw is the better pick for fast, lightweight sketching, and the worse pick for big workshops or a feature-rich team canvas.
- Free, open-source, no login to start
- Hand-drawn style for rough thinking
- Instant and extremely fast to use
- Can be self-hosted for full control
- ✓Unbeatable value, the core is free (4.8)
- ✓Easiest tool in this list to use (4.7)
- ✓Perfect for quick engineering sketches
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✗Far less feature depth than Miro (3.1 vs 4.7)
- ✗No structured facilitation suite
- ✗Limited integrations and formal support
| Criterion | Excalidraw | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Open-source | Yes | No |
| Value (our score) | 4.8 | 2.8 |
| Features (our score) | 3.1 | 4.7 |
| Support (our score) | 2.9 | 2.6 |
| From | Free | ~$10 |
Switch if you want instant, free, lightweight sketching, especially for engineering, but Miro still wins on feature depth, facilitation, integrations and the polish a big team canvas needs.
Conceptboard
Conceptboard is the alternative for teams whose first question is where their data lives. It is a European-hosted whiteboard built GDPR-first, so EU and regulated organisations get data residency and privacy out of the box rather than paying up to Miro's enterprise tier for it. The canvas covers the essentials well, with sticky notes, templates and live collaboration, and entry pricing from around 6 dollars per user undercuts Miro on value at 3.9. The honest gaps are breadth and ecosystem: feature depth at 3.6 and integrations at 3.3 trail Miro's 4.7 and 4.3, and the tool feels more functional than flashy. Conceptboard is the better pick when EU hosting and compliance lead the decision, and the worse pick when you want the deepest, most connected canvas on the market.
- European hosting, GDPR-first by default
- Solid core whiteboard and templates
- Lower entry pricing than Miro
- Live collaboration with external guests
- ✓EU data residency without an enterprise deal
- ✓Better value than Miro (3.9 vs 2.8)
- ✓Privacy-first for regulated teams
- ✓Clean enough for everyday collaboration
- ✗Less feature depth than Miro (3.6 vs 4.7)
- ✗Smaller integration library (3.3 vs 4.3)
- ✗More functional than polished
| Criterion | Conceptboard | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| EU hosting | Default | Enterprise only |
| Value (our score) | 3.9 | 2.8 |
| Features (our score) | 3.6 | 4.7 |
| Integrations (our score) | 3.3 | 4.3 |
| From | ~$6 | ~$10 |
Switch if EU hosting and GDPR-first privacy lead your decision, but Miro still wins on feature depth, integrations and overall polish for teams without those constraints.
Microsoft Whiteboard
Microsoft Whiteboard is the alternative that may already be paid for. If your organisation runs on Microsoft 365, you get a free whiteboard built into Teams, so quick brainstorms and meeting sketches happen inside tools your team already uses, with no new contract and no extra per-editor cost. That bundled value scores 4.6, and the Teams integration makes it the path of least resistance for Microsoft-first orgs. The trade-off is depth: feature depth scores just 2.9 against Miro's 4.7, the template and facilitation tooling is basic, and integrations outside the Microsoft world are limited. Microsoft Whiteboard is the better pick when you want zero extra spend inside an existing Microsoft stack, and the worse pick when you need a serious, full-featured collaboration canvas.
- Included free with Microsoft 365
- Native Microsoft Teams integration
- Simple, familiar for Office users
- No extra per-editor cost
- ✓Effectively free if you own Microsoft 365 (4.6 value)
- ✓Seamless inside Teams and Office
- ✓Zero new contract or onboarding
- ✓Fine for quick meeting brainstorms
- ✗Much shallower than Miro (2.9 vs 4.7 features)
- ✗Basic templates and facilitation
- ✗Limited integrations outside Microsoft
| Criterion | Microsoft Whiteboard | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Bundled | ~$10/editor |
| Value (our score) | 4.6 | 2.8 |
| Features (our score) | 2.9 | 4.7 |
| Teams integration | Native | Add-on |
| From | Included | ~$10 |
Switch if you already pay for Microsoft 365 and want a free whiteboard inside Teams, but Miro still wins clearly on features, templates, facilitation and integrations.
How to choose a Miro alternative
The right alternative depends on why Miro stopped fitting. Our scores weight the five criteria, ease, value, features, support and integrations, so a tool can win overall by being strong where you actually feel the pain. Start from your real reason for leaving, cost, facilitation, diagramming, simplicity or hosting, then match it to the tool below.
Leaving over cost
Need facilitation
Need diagramming or simplicity
Migrating from Miro
- Name your real reason for leaving: cost, facilitation, diagramming, simplicity or data hosting.
- Count how many editors you truly need versus viewers, since per-editor pricing rewards that split.
- Check whether the free plan limit, often around three boards, is a real ceiling for your team.
- Confirm it integrates with the tools you live in, from Figma to Teams to your diagramming app.
- If you are in the EU or regulated, verify data residency and GDPR hosting before you commit.
- Export one real Miro board and test the import in your shortlist with your own content first.
Miro alternatives, the FAQ
What is the best free alternative to Miro?
The best genuinely free alternative to Miro in 2026 is Excalidraw. It is open-source, opens instantly with no login, and the core product is free forever, scoring 4.8 on value in our test, the highest in this list. For teams that want a more conventional whiteboard, FigJam has a generous free plan and is free for anyone already on Figma, while Microsoft Whiteboard is effectively free if your organisation already pays for Microsoft 365. The trade-off with the free options is depth: Excalidraw and Microsoft Whiteboard are much lighter than Miro, scoring 3.1 and 2.9 on features against Miro's 4.7. They are ideal for quick sketches and simple collaboration, but a big team running complex boards across many initiatives will feel the ceiling, so treat free as a starting point you may grow out of.What is a cheaper alternative to Miro?
FigJam is the cheapest credible alternative to Miro for a team that wants a real whiteboard. It charges roughly 5 dollars per editor against Miro's 10 dollars on Starter and 20 on Business, and it is free for design teams already paying for Figma, which is why it wins our best value award at 4.4 against Miro's 2.8. Conceptboard also undercuts Miro from around 6 dollars per user, Excalidraw is free and open-source, and Microsoft Whiteboard is bundled with Microsoft 365. The key is the per-editor model: if most of your people only view or comment, paying per editor rather than per seat can cut your bill sharply, so count your true editors before comparing sticker prices.Is FigJam better than Miro?
It depends on what you need. In our test FigJam scores 4.2 overall and Miro 3.8, but they win on different things. FigJam wins on value and ease: it is roughly half the per-editor price, free on Figma, and friendlier for non-technical users, scoring 4.6 on ease and 4.4 on value. Miro wins on depth: its 4.7 features score is the highest in this guide, its template and integration library is bigger, and it handles huge, complex boards more comfortably. The honest split is this: FigJam is the better value whiteboard for design-led teams, while Miro is the better choice when you need the deepest, most connected canvas. If price and simplicity matter, lean FigJam. If feature depth is the priority, Miro is hard to beat.What is the best Miro alternative for workshops and facilitation?
Mural is the best Miro alternative for workshops, training and structured facilitation in 2026. It is built around running the room, with private mode for silent brainstorming, timed voting, and the ability to summon every participant to one area of the board, so facilitators keep a large session on track. It scores 4.1 overall in our test with strong 4.4 feature depth, and pricing sits in the same range as Miro, with a free plan capped at three murals. Lucidspark covers facilitation basics too if you also need diagramming. Miro can run workshops, but a facilitation-first tool like Mural removes friction when the experience of the session, not the raw canvas, is what matters most.Can these tools import my Miro boards?
Mostly, yes, though it varies by tool and it is rarely perfect. Several alternatives can import Miro boards directly or accept Miro's exported board files, and almost all accept standard image, PDF or CSV exports so you can rebuild key content. Sticky notes, shapes, text and basic frames usually map cleanly. The fiddly parts are complex nested frames, embedded integrations and AI-generated content, which do not always carry over intact. For a few important boards the move is typically an afternoon, rising to a day or more for a large, heavily integrated workspace. Always export one real board and test the import in your shortlisted tool before you commit the whole team.Why is Miro expensive?
Miro is not expensive on paper, since paid plans start around 10 dollars per user per month, but it can feel pricey in practice for three reasons. First, the free plan keeps only your three most recent boards editable, so any active team is pushed to pay quickly. Second, pricing is per editor and seats can be added automatically as people join boards, so costs climb as the group grows, especially when most people only view or comment. Third, useful features such as voting, timers, video chat and stronger admin controls sit on higher tiers, and reviewers report features migrating up the pricing ladder over time. That is why value scores a soft 2.8 in our hands-on test even though the headline price looks reasonable.Miro vs Mural: which should I choose?
Choose Mural if your work is facilitation: running workshops, training sessions and structured meetings, since it is purpose-built for that with private mode, timed voting and the ability to gather everyone to one spot, scoring 4.4 on features in our test. Choose Miro if you want the broadest, deepest general whiteboard, since its 4.7 feature score, larger template library and bigger integration ecosystem lead the market, and its ease edges Mural at 4.5 versus 4.2. Pricing is similar, both have a free plan capped at three boards, and both scale to enterprise. In short, Mural is the facilitation specialist and Miro is the all-round powerhouse, so let the way you actually use the canvas, guided sessions or open collaboration, decide.What is the best Miro alternative for engineers?
Excalidraw is the best Miro alternative for engineers and developers. It is open-source, opens instantly with no login, and its hand-drawn aesthetic signals rough thinking rather than polished deliverables, which is exactly why it became the default quick-sketch tool for engineering teams. It scores the highest ease and value in this guide at 4.7 and 4.8, and it can be self-hosted for full control. The trade-off is depth: feature depth scores just 3.1 against Miro's 4.7, with no real facilitation suite and limited integrations. Lucidspark is the alternative if engineers also need formal flowcharts and architecture diagrams, since it pairs with Lucidchart. For fast, free, throwaway sketches though, Excalidraw is hard to beat.What is the best Miro alternative for EU and GDPR needs?
Conceptboard is the best Miro alternative for EU-based and regulated teams in 2026. It is a European-hosted whiteboard built GDPR-first, so you get data residency and privacy out of the box rather than paying up to Miro's enterprise tier to unlock them. It covers the essentials well, with sticky notes, templates and live collaboration, and entry pricing from around 6 dollars per user undercuts Miro on value at 3.9 against 2.8. The honest gaps are breadth and ecosystem: feature depth at 3.6 and integrations at 3.3 trail Miro's 4.7 and 4.3. If EU hosting and compliance lead your decision, Conceptboard is the clear pick. If you do not have those constraints, a deeper tool like FigJam or Miro itself will feel richer.What is the best Miro alternative for Microsoft 365 teams?
Microsoft Whiteboard is the best Miro alternative for organisations already on Microsoft 365. It is included free with the seats you already own and built natively into Teams, so quick brainstorms and meeting sketches happen inside the tools your people already use, with no new contract and no extra per-editor cost, which is why it scores 4.6 on value. The trade-off is depth: feature depth scores just 2.9 against Miro's 4.7, with basic templates and facilitation and limited integrations outside the Microsoft world. It is the path of least resistance for Microsoft-first teams who want a simple, free canvas. If you need a serious, full-featured collaboration whiteboard, FigJam or Miro will serve you far better.
